sivavakkiyar:

image
image

Appendix 1 from Aijaz Ahmad’s Iraq, Afghanistan & The Imperialism Of Our Time

rongzhi:

image

English added by me :)

cabybapa:

this image is beautiful to me it is holy, this should be in a gallery

image

auntieashleydark:

anarchistmemecollective:

avatarbanaartjie:

anarchistmemecollective:

anarchistmemecollective:

anarchistmemecollective:

tweets by absurdistwords: there are teo camps within black thought: those who think allying with white people can be peoductive, and those who don't.  white people often end up supporting the second.ALT
are there black people who look at the history of whiteness and feel nothing but rage? yes.  are there those who look and seek the humanity trapped under whiteness? yes.  we just don't trust u.ALT
the whole point of whiteness was to tie europeans of assorted identities together. thr unifying thread was a principle of anti-blackness.  as with any cult or gang, the benefits demand loyalty.ALT
to ask a white person to show solidarity with black people is to ask them to turn against whiteness.  the source of their power, privilege, and identity.ALT
to show solidarity with black people is to literally turn against whiteness.  there is no way to show solidarity with black people while performing whiteness. the are mutually exclusive.ALT
we get that this is hard.  we get that you may really want to do the right thing.  we get that you may have put in all sorts of effort.  it's just that we don't trust you wont choose whiteness.ALT
put it this way.  if there is a national disaster and everyone has to evacuate. we EXPECT that white people would find a way to prioritize the escape of white people.ALT
we expect that white friends and allies will suddenly be all "well it's pragmatic you see.  we WOULD like to get everyone, but we have to take care of our own first. you'd do the same in our position"ALT
this seems cynical until you realize this has happened over and over again already. it happens everytime a black child is killed by police and white people don't riot.ALT
it happens each time a whote person unfriends a black person for mentioning their racism. it happens each time a white person demands the stage while a black person is speaking.ALT
every black person who has white friends at some point of saying "oh come on, not you too".  white people are lucy telling black people to kick the football just one more time.ALT
so by and large, as nice as ya'll are, as well-meaning as ya'll are. as honest and forthright as ya'll may be in everyday life.  we don't TRUST ya'll.ALT
if you're a white person and a black person loves uou, remember that this DESPITE not being able to trust ya'll.  don't take it personalky.  just prove us wrong.  and don't expect a pat on the back.ALT
time and again white people remind us that while your causes should be ours, our causes are not yours. solidarity with black people is optional for white people.ALT
in fact the legacy of whiteness means that withdrawing support for black people is a benefit.  it allows retreat into your comfort zone.  it allows you to enjoy privilege without concern.ALT
everything about whiteness makes throwing black people under the bus an immediately beneficial option.  financially, emotionally, socially.ALT
whiteness as a construct pits self-interest against human decency. it constantly reminds white people of the cost of turning against whiteness.  to trust you, black people have to have faith.ALT
white people have no track record of doing this in any organized or significant fashion. and why would it? what system explicitly prioritizes its own destruction?ALT
you will sell us out for your jobs. your partners. your kids. an election. stock price.  convenience. comfort. resources. preferential treatment. hell, you'll sell us out for retweets.  why trust you?ALT
now understand why black people raise an eyebrow at your peace-seeking calls for kimbaya.  (50 points for any white person who knows what that means besides a corny naive call for peace.)ALT
now, knowing all this, look at your pleas for acceptance through our eyes. look at your demands to have your opinion heard.  look at your admonishments for not joining your white cause or crusade.ALT
ask yourself what presumption of good faith white people have earned. how much of your comfort are you willing to sacrifice i. the name of solidarity with black people? don't answer.  think about it.ALT
the answer in your heart is the answer we see on your faces.ALT

history of kumbaya:

https://twitter.com/absurdistwords/status/1128275772446212097?s=21

I hope I never forget this till the day I die

Am I willing to let solidarity with people actually cost me something?

Would I fight for a cause that doesn’t benefit me, or may even result in me losing privilege?

Do I even know what that privilege actually looks like, in my every day life?

damn

“unlearning white supremacy isn’t instagramable.  it’s deeply personal and difficult work. it often feels horrible. it will make you cry. it will shatter your ego and your belief system.  do it anywayALT

I have failed at this, many times. Now, to get back on the damn horse.

papasmoke:

a second bumblebee has hit the twin flowers

inneskeeper:

red-mercer:

inneskeeper:

dispatchesfromtheclasswar:

image

sometimes i forget most people don’t know that birdhouse shapes aren’t just for shits and giggles and that birds actively prefer and even need specific shapes to nest in

So which ones need the Frank Lloyd Wright ass houses?

the ones that make 240,000$ a year by making other birds work in their warehouse for 5 sunflower seeds a day

jame7t:

a grenade is a small easily startled animal

puertohurraco:

animentality:

image

really wishing the best of the best for that boy

rubyleaf:

You know, when I see fictional characters who repress all their emotions, they’re usually aloof and very blunt about keeping people at a distance, sometimes to an edgy degree—but what I don’t see nearly enough are the emotionally repressed characters who are just…mellow.

Think about it. In real life, the person that’s bottling up all their emotions is not the one that’s brooding in the corner and snaps at you for trying to befriend them. More often than not, it’s that friendly person in your circle who makes easy conversation with you, laughs with you, and listens and gives advice whenever you’re upset. But you never see them upset, in fact they seem to have endless patience for you and everything around them—and so you call them their friend, you trust them. And only after months of telling them all your secrets do you realize…

…they’ve never actually told you anything about themselves.

despazito:

staff:

Tumblr’s Core Product Strategy

Here at Tumblr, we’ve been working hard on reorganizing how we work in a bid to gain more users. A larger user base means a more sustainable company, and means we get to stick around and do this thing with you all a bit longer. What follows is the strategy we’re using to accomplish the goal of user growth. The @labs group has published a bit already, but this is bigger. We’re publishing it publicly for the first time, in an effort to work more transparently with all of you in the Tumblr community. This strategy provides guidance amid limited resources, allowing our teams to focus on specific key areas to ensure Tumblr’s future.

The Diagnosis

In order for Tumblr to grow, we need to fix the core experience that makes Tumblr a useful place for users. The underlying problem is that Tumblr is not easy to use. Historically, we have expected users to curate their feeds and lean into curating their experience. But this expectation introduces friction to the user experience and only serves a small portion of our audience. 

Tumblr’s competitive advantage lies in its unique content and vibrant communities. As the forerunner of internet culture, Tumblr encompasses a wide range of interests, such as entertainment, art, gaming, fandom, fashion, and music. People come to Tumblr to immerse themselves in this culture, making it essential for us to ensure a seamless connection between people and content. 

To guarantee Tumblr’s continued success, we’ve got to prioritize fostering that seamless connection between people and content. This involves attracting and retaining new users and creators, nurturing their growth, and encouraging frequent engagement with the platform.

Our Guiding Principles

To enhance Tumblr’s usability, we must address these core guiding principles.

  1. Expand the ways new users can discover and sign up for Tumblr.
  2. Provide high-quality content with every app launch.
  3. Facilitate easier user participation in conversations.
  4. Retain and grow our creator base.
  5. Create patterns that encourage users to keep returning to Tumblr.
  6. Improve the platform’s performance, stability, and quality.

Below is a deep dive into each of these principles.

Keep reading

image

macleod:

yeah, sure I’ll reblog that

princesssarisa:

In the past I’ve shared other people’s musings about the different interpretations of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice. Namely, why Orpheus looks back at Eurydice, even though he knows it means he’ll lose her forever. So many people seem to think they’ve found the one true explanation of the myth. But to me, the beauty of myths is that they have many possible meanings.

So I thought I would share a list of every interpretation I know, from every serious adaptation of the story and every analysis I’ve ever heard or read, of why Orpheus looks back.

One interpretation – advocated by Monteverdi’s opera, for example – is that the backward glance represents excessive passion and a fatal lack of self-control. Orpheus loves Eurydice to such excess that he tries to defy the laws of nature by bringing her back from the dead, yet that very same passion dooms his quest fo fail, because he can’t resist the temptation to look back at her.

He can also be seen as succumbing to that classic “tragic flaw” of hubris, excessive pride. Because his music and his love conquer the Underworld, it might be that he makes the mistake of thinking he’s entirely above divine law, and fatally allows himself to break the one rule that Hades and Persephone set for him.

Then there are the versions where his flaw is his lack of faith, because he looks back out of doubt that Eurydice is really there. I think there are three possible interpretations of this scenario, which can each work alone or else co-exist with each other. From what I’ve read about Hadestown, it sounds as if it combines all three.

In one interpretation, he doubts Hades and Persephone’s promise. Will they really give Eurydice back to him, or is it all a cruel trick? In this case, the message seems to be a warning to trust in the gods; if you doubt their blessings, you might lose them.

Another perspective is that he doubts Eurydice. Does she love him enough to follow him? In this case, the warning is that romantic love can’t survive unless the lovers trust each other. I’m thinking of Moulin Rouge!, which is ostensibly based on the Orpheus myth, and which uses Christian’s jealousy as its equivalent of Orpheus’s fatal doubt and explicitly states “Where there is no trust, there is no love.”

The third variation is that he doubts himself. Could his music really have the power to sway the Underworld? The message in this version would be that self-doubt can sabotage all our best efforts.

But all of the above interpretations revolve around the concept that Orpheus looks back because of a tragic flaw, which wasn’t necessarily the view of Virgil, the earliest known recorder of the myth. Virgil wrote that Orpheus’s backward glance was “A pardonable offense, if the spirits knew how to pardon.”

In some versions, when the upper world comes into Orpheus’s view, he thinks his journey is over. In this moment, he’s so ecstatic and so eager to finally see Eurydice that he unthinkingly turns around an instant too soon, either just before he reaches the threshold or when he’s already crossed it but Eurydice is still a few steps behind him. In this scenario, it isn’t a personal flaw that makes him look back, but just a moment of passion-fueled carelessness, and the fact that it costs him Eurydice shows the pitilessness of the Underworld.

In other versions, concern for Eurydice makes him look back. Sometimes he looks back because the upward path is steep and rocky, and Eurydice is still limping from her snakebite, so he knows she must be struggling, in some versions he even hears her stumble, and he finally can’t resist turning around to help her. Or more cruelly, in other versions – for example, in Gluck’s opera – Eurydice doesn’t know that Orpheus is forbidden to look back at her, and Orpheus is also forbidden to tell her. So she’s distraught that her husband seems to be coldly ignoring her and begs him to look at her until he can’t bear her anguish anymore.

These versions highlight the harshness of the Underworld’s law, and Orpheus’s failure to comply with it seems natural and even inevitable. The message here seems to be that death is pitiless and irreversible: a demigod hero might come close to conquering it, but through little or no fault of his own, he’s bound to fail in the end.

Another interpretation I’ve read is that Orpheus’s backward glance represents the nature of grief. We can’t help but look back on our memories of our dead loved ones, even though it means feeling the pain of loss all over again.

Then there’s the interpretation that Orpheus chooses his memory of Eurydice, represented by the backward glance, rather than a future with a living Eurydice. “The poet’s choice,” as Portrait of a Lady on Fire puts it. In this reading, Orpheus looks back because he realizes he would rather preserve his memory of their youthful, blissful love, just as it was when she died, than face a future of growing older, the difficulties of married life, and the possibility that their love will fade. That’s the slightly more sympathetic version. In the version that makes Orpheus more egotistical, he prefers the idealized memory to the real woman because the memory is entirely his possession, in a way that a living wife with her own will could never be, and will never distract him from his music, but can only inspire it.

Then there are the modern feminist interpretations, also alluded to in Portrait of a Lady on Fire but seen in several female-authored adaptations of the myth too, where Eurydice provokes Orpheus into looking back because she wants to stay in the Underworld. The viewpoint kinder to Orpheus is that Eurydice also wants to preserve their love just as it was, youthful, passionate, and blissful, rather than subject it to the ravages of time and the hardships of life. The variation less sympathetic to Orpheus is that Euyridice was at peace in death, in some versions she drank from the river Lethe and doesn’t even remember Orpheus, his attempt to take her back is selfish, and she prefers to be her own free woman than be bound to him forever and literally only live for his sake.

With that interpretation in mind, I’m surprised I’ve never read yet another variation. I can imagine a version where, as Orpheus walks up the path toward the living world, he realizes he’s being selfish: Eurydice was happy and at peace in the Elysian Fields, she doesn’t even remember him because she drank from Lethe, and she’s only following him now because Hades and Persephone have forced her to do so. So he finally looks back out of selfless love, to let her go. Maybe I should write this retelling myself.

Are any of these interpretations – or any others – the “true” or “definitive” reason why Orpheus looks back? I don’t think so at all. The fact that they all exist and can all ring true says something valuable about the nature of mythology.

odvulture:

The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Phantom of the Opera and Beauty and the Beast all speak to one of humankind most consistent questions;

can French men be loved?

no-this-is-ryan:

no-this-is-ryan:

no-this-is-ryan:

no-this-is-ryan:

no-this-is-ryan:

no-this-is-ryan:

As a lesbian, it’s happened twice already that one “guy” stands out to me and I think “huh maybe they’re kinda cute and interesting, I wanna get to know them” and then I get to know them better and it’s a closeted trans girl who I somehow sniffed with my little nonbinary lesbian nose

IT JUST HAPPENED FOR A THIRD TIME!!!!

You guys will never believe what just happened to me

What does it mean if every “man” I’ve been attracted to was actually a trans woman? Idk what this says about my sexual orientation but it does mean I have astounding egg-dar

image

Gays being able to detect trans people of our preferred gender and being able to feel preemptive attraction to them is a phenomenon I was not aware extended to people beyond me

image